Kickstarting a Community Energy Revolution: Insights from the Energy Communities Forum in Brussels

On June 11, 2025, the “Kickstarting a Community Energy Revolution” event brought together a vibrant crowd of more than 70 energy transition enthusiasts in Brussels, uniting stakeholders from five LIFE Sister Projects – COMANAGE, LIFE LOOP, LIFE BECKON, LIFE TANDEMS, and LIFE LETsGO4Climate – for an inspiring afternoon of knowledge exchange, discussion, and community building.

Held at L42 in the heart of the EU Quarter, the event provided a dynamic platform for exploring the role of energy communities in the European energy transition. With contributions from 17 countries, the forum showcased a wide range of experiences, tools and policy insights, all of which focused on empowering citizens and local authorities to take the lead in sustainable energy initiatives.

event_0002_11.06.2025_Event_2229
event_0020_11.06.2025_Event_0299
event_0007_11.06.2025_Event_0232
event_0006_11.06.2025_Event_2643
event_0000_11.06.2025_Event_1359
event_0023_
event_0012_11.06.2025_Event_2098
event_0001_11.06.2025_Event_2914
event_0003_11.06.2025_Event_2187
event_0017_11.06.2025_Event_0841
event_0004_11.06.2025_Event_2136
event_0005_11.06.2025_Event_2860
event_0008_11.06.2025_Event_2525
event_0009_11.06.2025_Event_2462
event_0010_11.06.2025_Event_2374
event_0011_11.06.2025_Event_2332
event_0013_11.06.2025_Event_1493
event_0014_11.06.2025_Event_1269
event_0015_11.06.2025_Event_1182
event_0016_11.06.2025_Event_0903
event_0018_11.06.2025_Event_0787
event_0019_11.06.2025_Event_0327
event_0007_11.06.2025_Event_2571
event_0021_11.06.2025_Event_0246
event_0022_11.06.2025_Event_0191
previous arrow
next arrow

All images © Sam Glazier 2025

Roundtable Results: Ideas That Will Power the Future

The heart of the event lay in its thematic roundtable sessions. Each session delved deeply into a key challenge or opportunity for energy communities, sparking lively discussion among practitioners, policymakers and researchers. Here are some of the most notable insights:

🔹 Energy Poverty
 
Participants emphasised that the absence of a clear, shared definition of energy poverty continues to hinder meaningful action. The discussions focused on the need for short-term relief, such as subsidies, as well as long-term structural changes, including deep renovation, integrated district strategies and inclusive social housing. The need for compensation mechanisms and to reduce rebound effects was also highlighted as a priority.

🔹 Policy & Financial Tools
 
Examples from Italy, Spain, France and Belgium showed how creative financial and policy instruments can speed up the development of community energy. Practical solutions shared included social funds, microgrids, municipal roof access and bank guarantees. One key takeaway was that partnerships between municipalities and energy cooperatives, supported by policy innovation, can bridge the gap between ambition and implementation.

🔹 Energy Sharing Models
 
The debates clarified the differences between integrated and disaggregated energy sharing models. Although solar energy remains dominant, participants emphasised the importance of extending energy sharing to storage, efficiency and demand flexibility. There were calls for fairer pricing models, transparent markets and supportive regulation to reduce barriers to citizen participation.

🔹 The Role of Tools
 
The projects presented a wide array of tools, from matchmaking platforms to engagement games. However, there was one major concern: longevity. One-stop shops were suggested as a way to ensure that these tools survive beyond the lifespan of the projects. The human element was also identified as crucial: community building must precede energy community building. Trust, cultural relevance and analogue approaches remain vital.

🔹 Standards and Engagement
 
Although standards are important for achieving scale and implementing policy, they are insufficient to inspire public interest. It is recommended that energy conversations are reframed around values such as comfort and well-being, and that narratives are adopted which resonate with citizens’ everyday experiences.

A Celebration of Community and Collaboration

The event also featured a Sisters Library, where guests could explore the numerous publications, policy briefs and tools developed by the five projects. The afternoon concluded with a well-deserved networking cocktail, providing an opportunity to celebrate progress, forge new collaborations, and toast community energy. Key documents are available to download on the TANDEMS website.

Energy Sharing: Mission Possible – TANDEMS at EUSEW 2025

At this year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week – the EU’s flagship event for energy policy – the LIFE TANDEMS project took center stage in a dynamic policy session that explored a critical question: “Energy Sharing: Mission Impossible?”

Alongside our LIFE Sister Projects – BECKON, COMANAGE, ConnectHeat, and LifeLOOPTANDEMS convened an inspiring panel to tackle the regulatory, social, and political realities facing Europe’s energy communities. The answer that emerged was clear: not only is energy sharing possible, it’s already happening. However, its success hinges on political will, regulatory clarity and inclusive community engagement.

Key Takeaways from the Session

1. Energy Sharing Works – Even Without a Perfect Framework

From Gabrovo in Bulgaria to Copenhagen and Barcelona, local pioneers are building energy communities and implementing energy sharing, even in countries where the regulatory environment is less than ideal. Tanya Hristova, the mayor of Gabrovo, emphasised the importance of trust and political leadership. “People told us this wasn’t possible in Bulgaria – we proved them wrong,” she said. Gabrovo launched its first energy community within two months, with a second following quickly behind.

2. Regulation Must Empower, Not Obstruct

The current policy landscape often hinders more than it helps. Josh Roberts of REScoop.eu observed that many communities thrive despite regulation, rather than because of it. Participants called for streamlined permitting processes, financial guarantees and fairer grid access rules, particularly in cities where, as Erik Hagelskjær from Copenhagen noted, shared electricity between buildings is heavily taxed.

The EU’s new framework for energy sharing is a step in the right direction. According to Achille Hannoset from DG ENER, the upcoming Citizens Energy Package, along with guidance on network tariffs and grid integration, will help to standardise energy sharing across Member States, including for vulnerable households.

eusew25__0002_DSC_1564
eusew25__0005_DSC_1549
eusew25__0004_DSC_1552
eusew25__0000_DSC_1572
eusew25__0003_DSC_1556
previous arrow
next arrow

3. Community First, Energy Second

“Before you can build an energy community, you need to build a community,” said multiple speakers. This principle was embodied by Marcel Camps Inglés, the Area Metropolitana de Barcelona representative who engaged with citizens at local markets through La Teulada, a one-stop shop in Catalan meaning ‘the rooftop’, and raised awareness of energy sharing.

Similarly, Claudia Carani from AESS presented a compelling example from San Giuseppe Vesuviano. Building trust within a vulnerable community affected by poverty and organised crime required collaboration with existing social organisations and the provision of practical services, ranging from assistance with energy bills to technical advice. They concluded that engagement must be long-term, hyper-local and grounded in people’s real needs.

4. Inclusion Is a Necessity – Not a Bonus

True transformation must prioritise social justice. The most vulnerable citizens, including single mothers and renters, are often excluded from the benefits of energy communities. Participants strongly called for more targeted financing, public investment in the start-up phase and social conditions for support schemes. Practical solutions are however emerging: Achille Hannoset confirmed that Italy is piloting grant systems that reward energy communities serving vulnerable households. Meanwhile, Lithuania is offering 50% investment subsidies for the first time to projects with strong social criteria.

From Mission Impossible to Mission Inevitable

While the title of our session may have been provocative, it sparked the kind of ambitious yet grounded and inclusive conversation that Europe urgently needs. As TANDEMS and its partners made clear, energy sharing is a social and technical innovation. It can bridge rural and urban energy gaps, stimulate local investment and put people at the heart of the transition. 

To achieve this, we need more than just good ideas. We need action at every level — local, national and European — to dismantle regulatory obstacles, expand citizen access and shift from tokenistic inclusion to shared leadership. Together, we’re proving that community-led energy is not just a vision for the future. It’s already underway – and it’s unstoppable.

Building Trust in Vulnerable Communities: Insights from Otterbeek’s Energy Initiative

How do you foster energy-sharing in a community where trust is scarce and skepticism runs high? In Our work in Otterbeek highlights the challenges of fostering energy-sharing in a diverse neighborhood. From building trust to addressing cultural sensitivities, we’re diving into what it takes to engage every resident in the energy transition., the journey to build an inclusive energy community revealed some important lessons on patience, cultural sensitivity, and the power of personal connections.

Creating a successful energy-sharing initiative is no small feat, especially in neighborhoods where social cohesion is low, and mistrust is prevalent. In Otterbeek, the challenge was clear: how to engage residents and earn their trust in a project designed to benefit everyone. During a recent reflexive learning session, the Otterbeek team shared their approach and what they’ve learned about community engagement in these tough settings.

The Slow Path to Building Trust

In Otterbeek, trust isn’t given easily. Residents have faced numerous challenges, from economic pressures to language barriers, making them naturally cautious of new initiatives. The project team quickly realized that building trust in this environment wasn’t going to happen overnight.

“Trust takes time, especially in communities where people have experienced broken promises in the past,” one team member noted. To address this, the Otterbeek initiative adopted a hands-on approach, engaging with residents directly through door-to-door conversations. This personal touch helped to break down barriers, one interaction at a time.

Instead of expecting immediate results, the team embraced a long-term perspective, understanding that patience and persistence are key to earning the community’s confidence.

Cultural Sensitivity is Key

Otterbeek is home to a diverse mix of cultures, which means that a one-size-fits-all approach simply doesn’t work. The project team recognized the need for communication strategies that respect and understand these cultural differences.

“When working with such a diverse community, empathy and cultural awareness are essential,” said a project leader. By tailoring their engagement efforts to reflect the unique backgrounds and traditions of the residents, the team aimed to create a sense of belonging and inclusivity.

This approach wasn’t just about speaking the same language—it was about listening and responding to the community’s concerns in a way that felt genuine and respectful. This cultural sensitivity has proven crucial in breaking down walls of skepticism and encouraging more residents to join the conversation.

Next Steps: Personalized Outreach and Community Ambassadors

Looking ahead, the Otterbeek project will continue its personalized outreach efforts, focusing on one-on-one interactions and deepening its understanding of the community’s needs. An exciting development in their strategy involves the use of community ambassadors—local residents who can help bridge cultural gaps and act as trusted liaisons between the project and the neighborhood.

These ambassadors will play a vital role in creating a more supportive environment where all residents feel valued and included. Their unique perspective and local knowledge will help the project connect more effectively with the community, making the energy transition a shared journey.

Conclusion: Trust and Cultural Sensitivity as Pillars of Engagement

The Otterbeek experience has shown that trust and cultural sensitivity are not just desirable—they’re essential for successful community engagement. Building these foundations may take time and effort, but the payoff is worth it: a community that feels empowered, involved, and ready to embrace the energy transition.

By investing in relationships and understanding the diverse needs of residents, we can create a stronger, more inclusive path to a sustainable energy future.